\n
![](\"https:\/\/mycbh.com\/Games\/spaceperium\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Nietzsche187a.jpg\")
<\/p>\nA Reversal of Cosmic Expansion?
\n<\/p>\n
We all relate to the awe that views of distant galaxies inspire. It\u2019s first of all the sheer size of things that leaves us speechless, the vast numbers of stars involved, the fact that galaxies themselves exist in their hundreds of billions. But there is an even greater awe that envelops everything from our Solar System to the most distant quasar. That\u2019s the question of the ultimate fate of things.<\/p>\n
Nobody writes about this better than Fred Adams and Greg Laughlin in their seminal The Five Ages of the Universe<\/em><\/a> (Free Press, 2000), whose publication came just after the 1998 findings of Saul Perlmutter, Brian Schmidt and Adam Riess (working in two separate teams) that the expansion of the universe not only persists but is accelerating. The subtitle of the book by Adams and Laughlin captures the essence of this awe: \u201cInside the Physics of Eternity.\u201d<\/p>\n I read The Five Ages of the Universe<\/em> just after it came out and was both spellbound and horrified. If we live in what the authors call the \u2018Stelliferous era,\u2019 imagine what happens as the stars begin to die, even the fantastically long-lived red dwarfs. Here time extends beyond our comprehension, for this era is assumed to last perhaps 100 trillion years, leaving only neutron stars, white dwarfs and black holes. A \u2018Degenerate Era\u2019 follows, and now we can only think in terms of math, with this era concluding after 1040<\/sup> years. By the end of this, galactic structure has fallen apart in a cosmos littered with black holes.<\/p>\n Eventual proton decay, assuming this occurs, would spell the end of matter, with only black holes remaining in what the authors call \u2018The Black Hole Era.\u2019 Black hole evaporation should see the end of the last of these \u2018objects\u2019 in 10100<\/sup> years. What follows is the \u2018Dark Era\u2019 as the cosmos moves toward thermal equilibrium and no sources of energy exist. This is the kind of abyss the very notion of which drove 19th Century philosophers mad. Schopenhauer\u2019s \u2018negation of the Will\u2019 is a kind of heat death of all things. <\/p>\n But even Nietzsche, ever prey to despair, could talk about \u2018eternal recurrence,\u2019 and envision a future that cycles back from dissolution into renewed existence. You can see the kind of value judgments that float through all such discussions. Despair is a human response to an Adams\/McLaughlin cosmos, or it can be. Even recurrence couldn\u2019t save Nietzsche, who went quite mad at the end (precisely why remains a subject of debate). I have little resonance with 19th Century philosophical pessimism, so determinedly bleak. My own value judgment says I vastly prefer a universe in which expansion reverses. <\/p>\n Image:<\/strong> Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900). Contemplating an empty cosmos and searching for rebirth.<\/p>\n These thoughts come about because of a just released paper that casts doubt on cosmic expansion. In fact, \u201cStrong progenitor age bias in supernova cosmology \u2013 II. Alignment with DESI BAO and signs of a non-accelerating universe\u201d makes an even bolder claim: The expansion of the universe may be slowing. Again in terms of human preference, I would far rather live in a universe that may one day contract because it raises the possibility of cyclical and perhaps eternal universes. My limited lifespan obviously means that neither of the alternatives affects me personally, but I do love the idea of eternity.<\/p>\n An eternity, that is, with renewed possibilities for cosmic growth and endless experimentation with physical structure and renewed awakening of life. The paper, with lead researcher Young-Wook Lee (Yonsei University, South Korea) has obvious implications for dark energy and the so-called \u2018Hubble tension,\u2019 which has raised questions about exactly what the cosmos is doing. In this scenario, deceleration is fed by a much faster evolution of dark energy than we\u2019ve imagined, so that its impact on universal expansion is greatly altered.<\/p>\n What is at stake here is the evidence drawn from Type 1a supernovae, which the Nobel-winning teams used as distance markers in their groundbreaking dark energy work. Young-Wook Lee\u2019s team finds that these \u2018standard candles\u2019 are deeply affected by the ages of the stars involved. In this work, younger star populations produce supernovae that appear fainter, while older populations are brighter. Using a sample of 300 galaxies, the South Korean astronomers believe they can confirm this effect with a confidence of 99.999%. That\u2019s a detection at the five sigma level, corresponding to a probability of less than one in three million that the finding is simply noise in the data.<\/p>\n Image:<\/strong> Researchers used type Ia supernovae, similar to SN1994d pictured in its host galaxy NGC4526, to help establish that the universe\u2019s expansion may actually have started to slow. Credit: NASA\/ESA.<\/p>\n If this is the case, then the dimming of supernovae has to take into account not just cosmological effects but the somewhat more mundane astrophysics of the progenitor stars. Put that finding into the supernovae data showing universal expansion and a new model emerges, diverging from the widely accepted \u039bCDM (Lambda Cold Dark Matter) cosmology, which offers a structure of dark energy, dark matter and normal matter. This work forces attention on a model derived from baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO) and Cosmic Microwave Background data, which shows dark energy weakening significantly with time. From the paper:<\/p>\n \u2026when the progenitor age-bias correction is applied to the SN data, not only does the future universe transition to a state of decelerated expansion, but the present universe also already shifts toward a state closer to deceleration rather than acceleration. Interestingly, this result is consistent with the prediction obtained when only the DESI BAO and CMB data are combined\u2026 Together with the DESI BAO result, which suggests that dark energy may no longer be a cosmological constant, our analysis raises the possibility that the present universe is no longer in a state of accelerated expansion. This provides a fundamentally new perspective that challenges the two central pillars of the CDM standard cosmological model proposed 27 yr ago.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Let\u2019s pause a moment. DESI stands for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument<\/a>, which is installed on the 4-meter telescope at Kitt Peak (Arizona). Here the effort is to measure the effects of dark energy by collecting, as the DESI site says, \u201coptical spectra for tens of millions of galaxies and quasars, constructing a 3D map spanning the nearby universe to 11 billion light years.\u201d Baryon acoustic oscillations are the \u2018standard ruler\u2019 that reflect early density fluctuations in the cosmos and hence chart the expansion at issue.<\/p>\n Here\u2019s a comment from Young-Wook Lee:<\/p>\n \u201cIn the DESI project, the key results were obtained by combining uncorrected supernova data with baryonic acoustic oscillations measurements, leading to the conclusion that while the universe will decelerate in the future, it is still accelerating at present. By contrast, our analysis \u2014 which applies the age-bias correction \u2014 shows that the universe has already entered a decelerating phase today. Remarkably, this agrees with what is independently predicted from BAO-only or BAO+CMB analyses, though this fact has received little attention so far.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Presumably it will receive more scrutiny now, with the team continuing its research through supernovae data from galaxies at various levels of redshift. That dark energy work is moving rapidly is reflected in the fact that the Vera Rubin Observatory is projected to discover on the order of 20,000 supernova host galaxies within the next five years, which will allow ever more precise measurements. Meanwhile, the evidence for dark energy as an evolving force continues to grow. Time will tell how robust the Korean team\u2019s correction to what it calls \u2018age bias\u2019 in individual supernova readings really is.<\/p>\n The paper is Junhyuk Son et al., \u201cStrong progenitor age bias in supernova cosmology \u2013 II. Alignment with DESI BAO and signs of a non-accelerating universe,\u201d Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society<\/em>, Volume 544, Issue 1, November 2025, pages 975\u2013987 (full text<\/a>).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/mycbh.com\/Games\/spaceperium\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Low-Res_sn1994d.jpg\")
<\/p>\n\n
\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/mycbh.com\/Games\/spaceperium\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/tzf_img_post-1.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/div>\n